Jump to content

未助販毒案被告復原關鍵證據 大律師鄭明斌專業失當停牌三個月


Desmond Milligan

Recommended Posts

4bb2d3f6d6cfa62d63bdad977f5342.jpg

大律師鄭明斌被指無按販毒案被告指示,協助其復原電話訊息的關鍵證據,導致被告販毒罪成,判囚11年9個月。鄭明斌去年被裁定一項專業失當罪成,大律師紀律審裁組命令暫停鄭的執業資格三個月,並須承擔大律師紀律審裁組研訊65%訟費。

大律師鄭明斌(右)去年被裁定一項專業失當罪成。(資料圖片/朱棨新攝)

被忽視關鍵證據 被告一度入獄

根據審裁組文件,大律師鄭明斌2017年獲法援署委派,代表詹曉儀辯護一項販毒罪。詹曉儀曾向代表律師提交書面指示,指2016年因欠債欲「淨快錢」,答應替一名網民帶貨到日本而獲得報酬;對方初時指貨物為「DD」,及後改口稱象牙粉。詹曉儀赴內地接貨後回港被捕,行李內被發現逾864克氯胺酮,她被捕後刪除所有涉案訊息。審訊後她被裁定販毒罪成,被判囚11年9個月。

2019年10月,詹曉儀以原審大狀不稱職為由上訴得直,獲無罪釋放。事後大律師鄭明斌被投訴3項專業失當,其中一項專業失當被裁定罪成,惟鄭未有盡力跟進指示,無嘗試檢取已刪除的手機對話。

圖為氯胺酮,非案中證物。(資料圖片/鄭嘉惠攝)

須付研訊65%訟費

文件指,鄭明斌認為無技術可以復原訊息,亦擔心訊息會帶來反效果,因此無要求代表律師跟進。審裁組認為,鄭明斌雖無相關知識,但沒有按詹曉儀要求尋找解決辦法,包括專家意見等,以致沒有跟進。

審裁組終認為事件性質嚴重,鄭明斌無按客戶指示尋求專業協助,亦沒有跟進行動,故裁定專業失當罪成,判處停牌3個月,須付研訊65%訟費。

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. to insert a cookie message